Facilitating a book group can be daunting. So, naturally, I wanted to try it.
I submitted a proposal for a short stories book group six months ago, and my library thought it was a good idea. I designed a flyer, wrote a blog post and newsletter blurb to introduce the group, and selected six books for the reading group’s trial period.
- The Progress of Love / Alice Munro
- Fragile Things / Neil Gaiman
- Vampires in the Lemon Grove / Karen Russell
- A Better Angel / Chris Adrian
- The Dog of the Marriage / Amy Hempel
- This is How You Lose Her / Junot Diaz
I made several mistakes, but during the book group’s introductory period I’ve learned much about supporting readers in a group discussion setting. Preparation is key, but the right level of participation and the right book are equally important aspects of a flourishing fledgling book group.
Preparation
The leader needs to prepare by knowing the basics of the author’s biography and developing open-ended questions that pique readers’ interest. It goes without saying, the discussion leader must have read the book. If there’s time to read it twice (once for pleasure, and one close reading of the text), forming questions will be much easier. It’s essential to read reviews of the book — at the very least those in major sources like The New York Times Book Review, Atlantic Monthly, and New York Review of Books. Many ideas about theme, character, and plot will surface in the reading of reviews — and these elements formed the basis of every list of questions I developed for my group. When developing questions, think in terms of how a reader interacts with a book. When learning how to devise questions for a book group, I started with LitLovers “How To Talk About a Book” article.
Participation
The discussion leader’s role is to get group members talking to one another — asking a variety of questions, interjecting when a theme is being touched on by several group members but isn’t explicitly recognized by any of them, and/or turning the conversation when one member begins to dominate. It’s important to adapt the discussion to the group — considering the group’s size, members’ interests, previous reading experience, et cetera.
My major rookie mistake was assuming that I needed to have answers to all of the questions I posed, and to contribute those opinions to the discussion. To avoid developing a pedagogical tone for the group, the leader should hang back, let the readers drive the discussion, and steer mainly when it veers off topic. The leader should be flexible with the question list — favorite topics may not garner the enthusiasm the leader might have hoped for, the group may not even get to all the questions on the leader’s list, and members may come up with insights very different from those the facilitator has anticipated.
On the other end of the spectrum, the leader should always be prepared to discuss the work in depth, one on one. I once had a single member show up for the group — it was a rainy night, there was a popular event happening in the adjacent room, and parking in the Financial District was especially bad. Though intimidated, I approached the situation as if I were meeting a friend for coffee to talk about a book we’d both read. I posed a single question to get us started, and a true tête-à-tête ensued from there. It was a successful meeting despite an attendance of one.
Selection
A word on book selection: choose materials with broad appeal, especially for the introductory period. My members’ favorite collections were those by Alice Munro, Karen Russell, and Junot Diaz. On the other hand, it’s also worth keeping in mind that even if everyone hates the book, a good discussion might ensue. Don’t shy away from challenging your group with something they may not find accessible. For example, Amy Hempel is one of my favorite authors, but the readers who attended the discussion of The Dog of the Marriage announced immediately that they did not like the collection. I asked pointed questions as we dissected the book story-by-story, and as the hour progressed, attendees talked at great length about the stories’ complexity. At the end of the discussion, one member asked whether I liked the book; when I revealed that it was one of my top ten favorite books of all time, the group reacted with shock and awe. From my perspective, it was a coup that they couldn’t tell what my opinion was throughout the conversation — and that we had engaged in a sophisticated discussion of the themes and details of Hempel’s delicate work despite the group’s collective “dislike” of the book.

The most important thing I’ve learned about leading a reading group is to think of it as a discussion, because that’s what it is — an exploration of the worlds contained within words. Each meeting will be different based on who’s in attendance and the book on the table. Strong familiarity with the book, respect for each members’ contributions, a willingness to let the discussion unfold, and the ability to adapt to readers’ interests are essential in building a thriving reading group.